Cross-Chain Comparison
π― Objective
What are you trying to achieve?
To benchmark the performance and utilization of various EVM-compatible chains (such as Arbitrum, Avalanche, Polygon, etc.) by analyzing critical on-chain metrics. This helps users make informed decisions about network usage, scalability, and overall blockchain performance.
πͺ Audience
Who would this be ideal for?
Growth Marketers
BD Professionals
Crypto Investors and Analystss
Blockchain Developer
Protocol Operators
π Business Impact
How can this solve your problem?
Allocate marketing resources and launch strategies on the chain that offers the most engagement and lowest transaction costs. This prevents wasted resources on less active chains and ensures that efforts are focused on areas with the highest growth potential.
Understand which chain offers lower gas fees and higher user activity, so developers can choose the most appropriate chain for deploying their applications
Investors can make data-driven decisions about which chain offers better long-term value for their portfolio, avoiding projects on chains with stagnating growth or excessive costs.
π€ Exploratory Questions
Questions you might have
"What is the Total Value Locked (TVL) across different protocols on Arbitrum and Optimism?"
"How does the user activity compare between Arbitrum and Optimism?"
"Which chain has lower gas fees on average, and how does this affect user behavior?"
π¬ Example Queries
How can you use Orus to explore these answers?

[ARB, OPT]C [CRV]APP TVL G 90D

[ARB, OPT]C DAU G 90D

[ARB, OPT]C TGFEEN G 90D
Last updated
Was this helpful?